Actitudes frente al plagio académico en estudiantes de medicina de universidades privadas y públicas

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52379/mcs.v7i2.287

Keywords:

academic plagiarism, university students, student ethics

Abstract

Introduction: the development of the knowledge society, the information society and the rise of information and communication technologies (ICT) facilitate the multi-literacy of a student; however, they also facilitate and exploit academic and intellectual fraud. Objective: to know the student perception about plagiarism in research papers. Methods: descriptive, observational, cross-sectional study on the perception of plagiarism in students of public and private faculties of health sciences in Asunción. Results: of 139 students, 68 (49%) corresponded to public faculties. Between 51% and 69% carried out research work at least once in their university career, the mean age of the sample was 21 ± 3 years (range: 17–40 years). As for extracting information from the internet without referring to the author: there is a significant difference (p= 0.006) between public and private faculties: public: 38.2% sometimes do it, and 61.8% never do it. And the private ones: 56.3% sometimes do it, 38% never and 5.6% always do it. Most of the students refer that academic plagiarism is always carried out in the schools. The students state that measures must be implemented to avoid academic plagiarism in these percentages: between 64.6% and 73.5% must always be reported; cancel the research between 52.1% and 75%. Both measures present a significant difference between the public and private faculties (p<0.05). Discussion: in general, the perception of plagiarism among medical students is present, and they identify the concept of plagiarism. The causes are multifactorial from both the student and the teacher. There must be a penalty for authors who plagiarize, accompanied by awareness workshops at the initial levels of education, to avoid this practice

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Oxford Dictionaries. Internet. Oxford University Press; 2023. Consultado 12/04/2022. Disponible en: http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/words/the-oxford-englishdictionary

Scott-Lichter D and the Editorial Policy Committee, Council of Science Editors. CSE's White Paper on Promoting Integrity in Scientific Journal Publications, 2012 Update. 3rd Revised Edition. Wheat Ridge, CO: 2012.

Yates J. “Concerns” about medical students’ adverse behaviour and attitude: An audit of practice at Nottingham, with mapping to GMC guidance. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:196. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-196

Mason PR. Plagiarism in scientific publications. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2009;3(1):1-4. https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.98

Cole AF. Plagiarism in graduate medical education. Fam Med. 2007 Jun;39(6):436-438. URL.

Andreescu L. Self-plagiarism in academic publishing: the anatomy of a misnomer. Sci Eng Ethics. 2013;19(3):775-797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-012-9416-1

Blanch-Mur C, Rey-Abella F, Folch-Soler A. Nivel de conducta académica deshonesta entre los estudiantes de una escuela de ciencias de la salud. Enfermería Clínica. 2006;16(2):57-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1130-8621(06)71182-2

Sharma BK. Plagiarism among university students: Intentional or accidental? Journal of NELTA. 2007;12(1&2):134-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/nelta.v12i1.3440

Szabo A, Underwood J. Cybercheats: Is Information and Communication Technology Fuelling Academic Dishonesty? Active Learning in Higher Education. 2004;5(2):180–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787404043

Rennie SC, Crosby JR. Are "tomorrow's doctors" honest? Questionnaire study exploring medical students' attitudes and reported behaviour on academic misconduct. BMJ. 2001;322(7281):274-275. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7281.274

Ocampo Rojas S.J, Urizar, CA. Desconocimiento sobre plagio en estudiantes de ciencias de la salud. Discover Medicine. 2023;2(1):9-10. URL.

Ordoñez C, Mejía J. El fraude académico en la Universidad de los Andes ¿qué tanto y por qué? Revista de estudios sociales. 2004;18:13-25. https://doi.org/10.7440/res18.2004.01

Published

05/05/2023

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)