¿Se puede obtener una puntuación global de ansiedad y depresión a partir de la Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4)? Soporte empírico para un modelo unidimensional o de dos dimensiones en una muestra que ha experimentado la muerte de un ser querido

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52379/mcs.v8i3.425

Keywords:

Ansiedad, depresión, PHQ-4, psicometría

Abstract

Introduction: Worldwide, anxiety and depression are the most common mental disorders, both in clinical settings and in the general population. The Patient Health Questionnaire-4 is the most widely used open access instrument to assess anxiety and depression in both clinical and community settings. Objective: The study aims to evaluate the psychometric evidence of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4). Method: 1015 Peruvian individuals between 18 and 69 years old (M=26.4, SD=9.93, 58.6% women) who experienced the death of a loved one participated. Techniques derived from Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory (IRT) were used. Results: Three models were tested: one-dimensional (CFI = 0.989; TLI = 0.966; RMSEA = 0.075), the two-factor model (CFI = 1.000; TLI = 1.000; RMSEA = 0.000) and the bifactor model which did not converge. The two-factor model was the one that came closest to a perfect model. Reliability, evaluated using the omega coefficient, was adequate for both the unidimensional model (? = 0.88) and the two-factor model (? anxiety = 0.83; ? depression = 0.78). The IRT analysis indicated that the PHQ-4 items are adequate indicators that can discriminate between those who do or do not present the traits of anxiety and depression. Regarding the relationship between the PHQ-4 and pandemic grief, both the unidimensional model and the two-factor model demonstrated appropriate fit indices. It was shown that the one-dimensional and two-factor models are invariant according to gender and age. Conclusion: Although the one-factor model and two correlated factors show adequate fit indices, the second had a better fit. Furthermore, this model presented adequate reliability, discrimination and a significant relationship with dysfunctional grief.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Christodoulaki A, Baralou V, Konstantakopoulos G, Touloumi G. Validation of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) to screen for depression and anxiety in the Greek general population. J Psychosom Res. 2022;160:110970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.110970

Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, Löwe B. An Ultra-Brief Screening Scale for Anxiety and Depression: The PHQ–4. Psychosomatics 2009;50(6):613–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0033-3182(09)70864-3

Löwe B, Wahl I, Rose M, Spitzer C, Glaesmer H, Wingenfeld K, Schneider A, Brähler E. A 4-item measure of depression and anxiety: Validation and standardization of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) in the general population. J Affect Disord. 2010;122(1–2): 86-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2009.06.019

Nochaiwong S, Ruengorn C, Thavorn K, Hutton B, Awiphan R, Phosuya C, Ruanta Y, Wongpakaran N, Wongpakaran T. Global prevalence of mental health issues among the general population during the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89700-8

Organización Mundial de la Salud. Salud mental y COVID-19: datos iniciales sobre las repercusiones de la pandemia. In Organización Mundial de la Salud. 2022. URL

Ross AM, Ramlawi S, Fakhraei R, Murphy MSQ, Ducharme R, Dingwall-Harvey ALJ, White RR, Ritchie K, Muldoon K, El-Chaâr D. The psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and a SARS-CoV-2 testing programme on obstetric patients and healthcare workers. Womens Health. 2022;18:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057221103101

Organización Mundial de la Salud. Trastornos mentales; 2022. URL

Elflein J. Percentage of respondents worldwide who have felt anxiety or depression for more than two weeks as of 2020, by region. Statista; 2022. URL

Zhang SX, Batra K, Xu W, Liu T, Dong RK, Yin A, Delios AY, Chen BZ, Chen RZ, Miller S, Wan X, Ye W, Chen J. Mental disorder symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic in Latin America – a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2022;31:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796021000767

Villarreal-Zegarra D, Copez-Lonzoy A, Vilela-Estrada A, Huarcaya-Victoria J. Depression, post-traumatic stress, anxiety, and fear of COVID-19 in the general population and health-care workers. BMC Psychiatry. 2021;21(455):1–14. URL

Shear MK, Skritskaya NA. Bereavement and anxiety. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2012;14(3):169–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-012-0270-2

Sarigiannis KA, Tringali JJ, Vu J, England AE, Lietzau S, Hebert C, Banayan D, Basapur S, Glover CM, Shah RC, Gerhart J, Greenberg JA. Symptoms of Anxiety, Depression, and Stress among Families of Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 A Longitudinal Clinical Trial. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2023;20(5):705–12. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202209-797OC

Komischke-Konnerup KB, Zachariae R, Johannsen M, Nielsen LD, O’Connor M. Co-occurrence of prolonged grief symptoms and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress in bereaved adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord Rep. 2021;4:100140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadr.2021.100140

Garabiles MR, Lao CK, Yip P, Chan EWW, Mordeno I, Hall BJ. Psychometric Validation of PHQ–9 and GAD–7 in Filipino Migrant Domestic Workers in Macao (SAR), China. J Pers Assess. 2020;102(6):833-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2019.1644343

Stochl J, Fried EI, Fritz J, Croudace TJ, Russo DA, Knight C, Jones PB, Perez J. On Dimensionality, Measurement Invariance, and Suitability of Sum Scores for the PHQ-9 and the GAD-7. Assessment. 2022;29(3):355–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191120976863

Kocalevent RD, Finck C, Jimenez-Leal W, Sautier L, Hinz A. Standardization of the Colombian version of the PHQ-4 in the general population. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-14-205

Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An Inventory for Measuring Depression. Arch Gen Psychiatr. 1961;4(6):561–71. https://doi.org/10.1001/ARCHPSYC.1961.01710120031004

Kroenke K, Spitzer R, Williams JB. The PHQ-9. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:606-13. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x

Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1600-0447.1983.TB09716.X

Kim HW, Shin C, Lee SH, Han C. Standardization of the Korean version of the patient health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4). Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2021;19(1):104-11. https://doi.org/10.9758/CPN.2021.19.1.104

Khubchandani J, Brey R, Kotecki J, Kleinfelder JA, Anderson J. The Psychometric Properties of PHQ-4 Depression and Anxiety Screening Scale Among College Students. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2016;30(4):457-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2016.01.014

Materu J, Kuringe E, Nyato D, Galishi A, Mwanamsangu A, Katebalila M, Shao A, Changalucha J, Nnko S, Wambura M. The psychometric properties of PHQ-4 anxiety and depression screening scale among out of school adolescent girls and young women in Tanzania: A cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry. 2020;20(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02735-5

Ahmadi SM, Arani AM, Bakhtiari M, Davazdah Emamy MH. Psychometric properties of Persian version of patient health questionnaires-4 (PHQ-4) in coronary heart disease patients. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2019;13(4):1-7. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijpbs.85820

López Guerra VM, Aguirre Mejía AJ, Guerrero Alcedo JM. Propiedades psicométricas y estructura factorial del cuestionario de salud del paciente PHQ-4 en estudiantes universitarios ecuatorianos. Rev. cuba. enferm. 2022;38(3):1–15. URL

Esteban RFC, Mamani-Benito O, Cjuno J, Tito-Betancur M, Caycho-Rodríguez T, Vilca LW, Barrios I. Adaptación y validación de la Patient Health Questionnaire for Depression and Anxiety (PHQ-4) en una muestra de quechua hablantes peruanos. Med. clín. soc. 2024;8(1):63-74. https://doi.org/10.52379/mcs.v8i1.361

Ventura-León JL. ¿Componentes principales o factores comunes?: Comentarios al artículo de Hederich-Martínez y Caballero-Domínguez (2016). CES Psicol. 2017;10(1):146–7. https://doi.org/10.21615/cesp.10.1.9

Ahmadi SM, Arani AM, Bakhtiari M, Davazdah Emamy MH. Psychometric properties of Persian version of patient health questionnaires-4 (PHQ-4) in coronary heart disease patients. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2019;13(4):1-7. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijpbs.85820

Sanabria-Mazo JP, Gómez-Acosta A, Castro-Muñoz JA, et al. Dimensionality and reliability of the online version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) in a large Colombian sample: Results from the PSY-COVID study. Curr Psychol. 2024;43:11182–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05180-1

Alvarez EAC, Virú-Flores H, Alburqueque-Melgarejo J, Roque-Quezada JC, Valencia JG, Matta GAG, Quiroz DAL. Validación Del Cuestionario Sobre La Salud Del Paciente–9 (Phq-9) En internos de medicina humana de una universidad de referencia del Perú durante la pandemia Covid-19. Rev. Fac. Med. Hum. 2022;22(3):540-6. https://doi.org/10.25176/RFMH.v22i3.3179

Huarcaya-Victoria J, De-Lama-Morán R, Quiros M, Bazán J, López K, Lora D. Propiedades psicométricas del Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) en estudiantes de medicina en Lima, Perú. Rev Neuropsiquiatr. 2020;83(2):72-8. https://doi.org/10.20453/rnp.v83i2.3749

Anicama GJ, Ignacio CF, Talla BK, Bruno CB. PROPIEDADES PSICOMÉTRICAS DE LA ESCALA DEL TRASTORNO DE ANSIEDAD GENERALIZADA: GAD-7 EN UNIVERSITARIOS DE LIMA, PERÚ. ACPP. 2023;6(2):260-73. https://doi.org/10.56891/acpp.v6i2.361

Franco-Jimenez RA, Nuñez-Magallanes A. Propiedades psicométricas del GAD-7 , GAD-2 y GAD-Mini en universitarios peruanos in Peruvian College Students. Propósitos y Representaciones. 2022;10(1):1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.20511/pyr2022.v10n1.1437

Furr RM. Psychometrics: An introduction (3rd ed.). Sage publications; 2018.

Hambleton RK, Swaminathan H. Item response theory: Principles and applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1985.

Ato M, López-García JJ, Benavente A. Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología. Anal Psicol. 2013;29(3):1038-59. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511

Hernández-Ávila CE, Escobar NAC. Introducción a los tipos de muestreo. Alerta. 2019;2(1):75-79. https://doi.org/10.5377/alerta.v2i1.7535

Baltar F, Brunet I. Social research 2.0: virtual snowball sampling method using Facebook. Internet Res. 2012;22(1):57-74. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241211199960

Lee SA, Neimeyer RA. Pandemic Grief Scale: A screening tool for dysfunctional grief due to a COVID-19 loss. Death Stud 2022;46(1):14-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2020.1853885

Caycho-Rodríguez T, Vilca LW, Vivanco-Vidal A, Saroli-Araníbar D, Carbajal-León C, Gallegos WLA, Lee SA. Assessment of dysfunctional grief due to death from COVID-19 in Peru: adaptation and validation of a Spanish version of the pandemic grief scale. Trends Psychol. 2021; 29: 595-616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43076-021-00091-1

Lee SA, Neimeyer RA, Breen LJ. The Utility of the Pandemic Grief Scale in Identifying Functional Impairment from COVID-19 Bereavement. J Palliat Med. 2021;24(12):1783–8. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2021.0103

McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res. 1995;4(4):293-307. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01593882

Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit. Sociol Methods Res. 1992;21(2):230-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005

Xia Y, Yang Y. RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: The story they tell depends on the estimation methods. Behav Res Methods. 2019;51(1):409-28. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1055-2

Dominguez-Lara SA. Propuesta de puntos de corte para cargas factoriales: una perspectiva de fiabilidad de constructo. Enferm Clin. 2018;28(6):401-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2018.06.002

Viladrich C, Angulo-Brunet A, Doval E. A journey around alpha and omega to estimate internal consistency reliability. Anal Psicol. 2017;33(3):755-82. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.33.3.268401

Byrne BM. Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: a walk through the process. Psicothema. 2008; 20(4): 872–82. URL

Rutkowski L, Svetina D. Measurement Invariance in International Surveys: Categorical Indicators and Fit Measure Performance. Appl Meas Educ. 2017;30(1):39-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1243540

Samejima F. Graded response model. In Van Der Linden, W. J. & Hambleton (Eds.). Handbook of modern item response theory. New York: Springer Verlag. pp. 85-100). Springer New York. 1997. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2691-6_5

Maydeu-Olivares A. Goodness-of-Fit Assessment of Item Response Theory Models. Meas. 2013;11(3):71–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2013.831680

Revelle W. Package ‘psych’. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://cran.rstudio.org/web/packages/psych/psych.pdf; 2022.

Rosseel Y. Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw 2012; 48(2): 1-36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02

Chalmers RP. mirt?: A Multidimensional Item Response Theory Package for the R Environment. J Stat Softw. 2012;48(6):1-29. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i06

Ventura-León JL. PsyMetricTools (Software). Github. 2024.

Rizopoulos D. ltm?: An R Package for Latent Variable Modeling and Item Response Theory Analyses. J Stat Softw. 2006;17(5):1-25. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v017.i05

Tibubos AN, Otten D, Zöller D, Binder H, Wild PS, Fleischer T, Johar H, Atasoy S, Schulze L, Ladwig KH, Schomerus G, Linkohr B, Grabe HJ, Kruse J, Schmidt CO, Münzel T, König J, Brähler E, Beutel ME. Bidimensional structure and measurement equivalence of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9: sex-sensitive assessment of depressive symptoms in three representative German cohort studies. BMC Psychiatry. 2021; 21(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03234-x

Lobos-Rivera ME, Flores?Monterrosa AN, Tejada?Rodríguez JC, Chacón?Andrade ER, Caycho?Rodríguez T, Lee SA, Valencia PD, Carbajal?León C, Vilca LW, Reyes?Bossio M, Gallegos M. Pandemic grief in El Salvador: factors that predict dysfunctional grief due to a COVID?19 death among Salvadoran adults. Psicol Reflex Crit. 2023;36(9):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155?023?00250?6

Published

09/20/2024

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>